Compared to “misogynist”, “racist”, “homophobe”, “angry
white male”, “supremacist, “PSM” (Pale, Stale, Male)… these days excoriating a
traditional man as a “Male Chauvinist Pig” seems kind of quaint!
Back in the 60’s, while some of us were working our butts
off, obeying the laws, seeking to get ahead, providing for our families, treating
everyone with respect irrespective of their color, creed, religion, and holding
doors open for women, others shed their steel capped shoes for birkenstocks,
grew their hair long, wore tie-dye with beads around their necks and smoked
dope. With the latter celebrated in song, dance and Hollywood, it’s no wonder that
women eventually began to look with derision at limp-wristed washouts and loser
men abrogating both their responsibilities and, well, their manhood.
Forced or at least compelled to pick up the slack, women, many
whom really were discriminated against, took what has always been a
battle – the “Battle of the Sexes” from a cold war to a kinetic one. What
started in the early 1900’s as a demand for voting rights has now turned into
vicious misandry.
Look up male chauvinist pig and you find it refers to men
who think that women are inferior, objects to be used or kept like pets. The definition
is now used by militant feminists as depicting ALL men, but particularly white
men. And while we old white guys can laugh it off much as we do all the other
Leftist hysteria and political correctness, the assault on men has now
permeated pre-K and elementary schools, where normal boy behavior is denigrated
and labeled “toxic masculinity.”
Nicholas Chauvin, of course, was a legendary soldier in
Napoleon’s army who was famously supportive of his emperor and his country.
Chauvinism, therefore, meant patriotism but in the 60’s morphed into a
pejorative label referring to bigotry or bias on the part of any man.
I believe actual MCP’s in our society are few and far
between. Of course one can always find examples of men who treat women as
inferior and exhibit truly reprehensible behavior, but the vast majority of men
whom I’ve seen and encountered throughout our country, (and I’ve traveled
widely) treat women with respect, dignity, sometimes even reverence, and
always have!
Does the row of hard-hat construction boys with open
lunchboxes ogle and smirk and occasionally whistle at the women walking by?
Yes, and it’s more than just bad manners, but it isn’t male chauvinist pigism! Do
the vast majority of them head home after work, help their wives get dinner on
the table and the kids with their homework afterword? Yes, in my experience,
that’s precisely what they do.
Boyhood is and has been under attack for some time. “All boys, especially white boys, are rebuked for their masculinity. They watch as girls are told they are special. They are told they are privileged, guilty, and must atone for their sins as if they are themselves were white supremacists. The expectation for white boys is that they should get in line behind girls, children of color, and illegal immigrants.” – Noel Anenberg, August 16, 2019, American Thinker, “Ideology, the Schools, and Murder: The McInerney/King Case“
Should women look at every man as a potential rapist or
molester? Should men never again compliment a woman for any reason? Shall men
allow themselves to shrivel up and just sit quietly in a corner while feminazis
(my preferred term for the small minority of loud, bitter, militants who have
hijacked the noble feminist agenda), foment
their warped ideology and escalate a battle that has resulted in
anti-patriotism (e.g. the Women’s Soccer Team) and, for example, female quotas
for football teams and military combat units?
I think not.
Not too many years ago I held open a door for a woman who
nastily said as she came through, “I can open it myself.” Should I
have slammed it in her face? I felt like it, but no, in fact, we traditional
men are going to have to suck it up and ride out this war, picking our battles
and alternating between fighting and diplomacy, between stiffening our spines
and quietly acquiescing, between speaking out against the male-bashing drivel
and just staying quiet and letting the feminazis spew their venom. I’m
heartened that traditional women are increasingly throwing down the BS flag on
radical feminism and pushing back with “You don’t represent ME!”
In short, if holding to traditional views of gender roles,
civil, polite and well-mannered manhood is being a Male Chauvinist Pig, please
feel free to call me one!
It’s tough to be courteous to vile people, and the Left are
becoming increasingly, unbearably vile.
Yet, we need to try. If we’re ever going to restore civility
and traditionalism to our country, we need to respect what our parents taught
us about courteousness.
I have a complete repertoire of lawyer jokes and have more
than once repeated the old joke about how 5,000 dead lawyers at the bottom of
the ocean is, “A start.” But there’s one thing we can learn from
lawyers, particularly trial lawyers. Watch any law-themed series on television
or better, attend a jury trial in a real courtroom, and you’ll see the
attorneys act (99% of the time) with professionalism and courtesy towards the
jury, the plaintiff, the defendant, their counsel and the judge. How they do it
in the face of the distortions, spin, deflections, etc. that are thrown around
by each side; how they can be civil when the integrity of witnesses,
particularly, are impugned so viciously albeit courteously, is extraordinary.
The performances may be part of the theatrics of litigation, but they’re
instructive nonetheless. Often, the attorney who makes the best impression is
the one who wins the case, and courtesy is an integral part of the act and how
they make that impression.
Many years ago I was recruited to serve as the CFO of an
obscure tech company. Seeking a ground floor opportunity in the post Y2K,
burgeoning tech world, I responded to the offer to talk to them. One bright,
sunny morning I visited its headquarters in Manhattan and was ushered into a
conference room to await the CEO.
As I stood looking out the window over the Manhattan skyline,
a young fellow came in and began gathering up some used styrofoam coffee cups
and arranging and stacking some coasters that sat on the highly polished
conference room table. He had on an open collar, rather wrinkled plaid shirt,
jeans, and he had hair down to the middle of his back tightly pulled back on
his head and gathered in a pony tail with a rubber band at the nape of his
neck.He went about his business sheepishly, almost furtively, without speaking.
Having turned to see who had entered the room, I offered a
pleasant “Good Morning” and then proceeded to help him gather up the
cups and tidy up the room. He held open the garbage bag while I tossed in some
of the debris from an earlier meeting, and he thanked me as he completed his
task and left.
The whole incident took no more than perhaps 60 seconds, and
I thought nothing of it. A minute or two later the CEO came in, dressed in a
suit as was I, and we sat and had a straightforward and frank conversation
about the company’s needs, my qualifications, etc. – everything you’d expect
from a standard executive interview.
And then the CEO said, “You know, I’d like you to meet
the President of the Company who is really my partner and co-founder. Do you
have a few more minutes?” I of course replied, “Certainly,” and
the CEO left, returning a couple of minutes later with, you guessed it, the man
who previously had come in to tidy up the room.
I am convinced to this day that the judgment about hiring me
to become the Company’s CFO was made in that two minute interval when the CEO
left to fetch the President. And I am also convinced that the pivotal trigger
moment which sealed the deal had nothing to do with the interview, but
everything to do with the simple courtesy I extended to the President in that
little interchange before the interview started.
A wise man was once quoted as saying, “The true greatness of
a person, in my view, is evident in the way he or she treats those with whom
courtesy and kindness are not required.” Joseph B. Wirthlin
Most of the time, simple courtesies aren’t recompensed with
a job offer, or even acknowledged. Yet, a kind word, treating others with
respect and dignity no matter what their station or role in life, is the right
thing to do.
“If it bleeds, it leads.” Everything is a crisis! Today news
reports, tweets, Facebook posts and even conversations with friends are constantly
linked to CRISIS! The more provocative, the more incendiary the topic, the
better. Attention everyone…we’re becoming immune/desensitized to REAL crises!
The Iranians, Chinese, Russians, Venezuelans, North Koreans,
European Union, the NRA, White Supremacists, Old Angry White Men, Epstein’s
suicide or murder, the Border, Mass Shootings, lead in the water in Newark,
N.J., California earthquakes and wild fires, heat waves in the Southwest, inflation,
deflation, stocks up, stocks down, hail in Colorado, racism, fascism, xxxxxism,
melting icebergs, expansion of the Antarctic, meteors coming within a million
miles of the Earth…they’re ALL a crisis. We are receiving a constant firehose
of hysteria.
Good news doesn’t have a chance. Sure, there’s occasionally
a “human interest” segment that talks about the surprise return to his family of
a soldier from the war front or neighbors looking out for neighbors, but it’s
as if they’re thrown into the lineup just so the media can assert they also
report good news. And if that good news doesn’t have a heart-string-tugging
video associated with it, you’ll never hear about it.
If it isn’t crisis, it’s oddity, faux science, or just plain
clickbait: “DNA determines your politics” is one headline. “Cop pelted with
Chinese food during wild Bronx melee” is another. If it’s true that we are what
we read, watch on TV or listen to… THIS is what we’re becoming: a population of
paranoid, terrified, morbidly curious onlookers!
There’s no changing the info-feed. It’s going to continue like this so long as we click on the link or keep tuned to the tabloid channels (which is what virtually every cable news outlet is today with the exception, perhaps, of One America News).
My recommendation is simple…subscribe to ONE newsfeed and
only pay attention to what they cite as breaking or important headlines – mine
is the Wall Street Journal’s, and I may get one or two
“notifications” a day. Watch ONE evening newscast – I watch OANN’s 6:00
PM Report with Patrick Hussion. And for goodness sake don’t spend hours on
Social Media and tabloid sites!
We’ve simply got to refocus on Stuff That Matters. Please America, let’s eschew nonsense and deviance and embrace substance and goodness.
Let’s say a silent prayer and keep looking ahead when we
pass the ambulances, fire trucks and wreck by the side of the road.
The hyperventilating politicians can’t help themselves. Doing
something, ANYTHING whether it makes sense or not, is not only predictable, but
to every thinking American, laughable. We see this in children desperate for
attention, except these are supposed to be adults. “Never let a crisis go to
waste.” Insidiously true!
First come the cries of “We have to have a serious conversation…”. Almost immediately thereafter comes the search for a scapegoat, “It’s the [fill in the blank]’s fault!” Then come the condescending vituperations and finally, if enough celebrities jump on the bandwagon, come the protests and sometimes riots.
For example, let’s take the current “mass shootings”. Even
though it’s been said a dozen times over that all the legislation needed to
enforce gun laws are already on the books, and nothing being proposed would
have made any difference in the great majority of the incidents, the theatrics
are omnipresent. The 2020 presidential candidates’ hand-wringing, eye-rolling,
blame-their-opponents, gnashing of teeth, weeping, wailing, demands to “do
something”… it’s all unadulterated nonsense.
Why? Because if every gun in America were eliminated on a Monday, how many guns would there be on the streets by Friday, and who would have them? Of course, the answer is hundreds, if not thousands, and it’d be the criminals and the madmen! And then we’d have to defend ourselves with baseball bats. I submit you’d have to have a hellavu swing to knock out of the park a 9MM bullet shot by a determined gunman threatening your family.
But on the Left, the rhetoric is tantamount to “confiscate all guns and America will be a safer place”. More nonsense. It’d be like giving everyone in the country a tee-shirt with a target on it and the words, “shoot here”.
“We’ve got to get the guns out of the hands of the people who shouldn’t have them,” is another familiar cry. Enacting legislation that tries to do this would create more injustice to responsible gun owners. Whether a responsible gun owner goes to jail or not would then be dependent on how good the victimhood act from the aggrieved party is. “He (or she…let’s not be sexist here) is an angry old white man who’s threatening me!” Of course, the spouse making that allegation may have just had his or her belongings destroyed by that baseball bat or some other infliction, and the threats were made by the non-gun-owner party. Who gets arrested?
No, the solution to the mass shooting problem is not more legislation. The solution is easily described but terribly difficult to achieve. It is the return to and practice of traditional values in society. Fundamental morality has to become popular again. The teaching of right and wrong has to be the norm. Heroes have to be good rather than evil, and the Golden Rule has to prevail. In the late sixties, before the pendulum swung completely to the left, it would not have been such a herculean task. Today, with the pendulum so far left it’s near the 270 degree mark, it is.
We are repeating the mistake of history. Every great civilization: Egypt, Athens, Rome, Western Europe and now America, has gone through the same pattern: growth, prosperity, indolence, moral decay, the rise of deviant, destructive hedonism and demagogues, challenges from envious nations, the crumbling of traditional family units, the celebration of evil and immorality, the eventual decline of the culture, sovereignty impugned until its demise and replacement by another civilization in an earlier stage of the cycle.
Where do you think we are in this continuum?
The rampant demagoguery we’re witnessing is the sad symptom of a great civilization that is very ill. Is our situation fatal? Absolutely not. There are many among us who are speaking out and trying to push that pendulum back the other way. We do so by word and deed. In public we no longer speak in whispers or hushed tones about the rabid and caustic influence the Left is having on our society. When we walk our dogs, we don’t just pick up after them, we take an extra bag along and collect wrappers and cans and plastic water bottles along the street as well.
Sadly, but inevitably, it takes an outside shock like a world war, a natural disaster, a pandemic or some other cataclysmic event to wake us up and propel us to pay attention to the basics again. And by basics I mean the STUFF THAT MATTERS.
But the one thing we need more than anything to turn our
civilization around is MORAL LEADERSHIP. The fact that so many would scoff at
the previous sentence is symptomatic of how great the need is.
The 2016 presidential election was a cataclysmic event and it indeed caused us to reflect on what matters. Now we need to pick up the pieces of our society broken by the events of the last 11 or so years and MAKE GOOD COOL AGAIN.
And we have to somehow get rid of demagogue politicians and replace them with serious adults who ACTUALLY care about our country and its future rather than power, influence and money – ones who will sometimes stand there and do nothing instead of making things worse.
I can’t stand it anymore! At a restaurant the other night I felt like jumping up and grabbing the two millennials at the table next to ours by the throat and screaming “Stop it!” Between the gravel in their throats and the upticks at the end of sentences that each had a minimum of three “likes” in them, my wife and I cringed. It actually ruined what would have otherwise been a very nice dinner at our favorite dining spot. (If you don’t know what vocal fry and upticks are all about, just do a search on YouTube.)
It’s everywhere, not just in public but also in the workplace. What was particularly jarring was that the girls were talking about their college experiences and their schools were two of the best in the nation! How faculties can allow their students to graduate high school much less college without an ability to string two coherent and grammatically correct English sentences together is shocking and lamentable!
In our day, the filler words were “you know”. “It was nice at the beach yesterday, you know?” “I can’t understand, you know, how she could have said that.” “You know” was annoying, but I guess we were blessed that the painful vocal fry and uptick problems weren’t so common.
There were regional accents of course: Brooklyn, Bronx and Queens; Midwest; Minnesotan; Texas; Boston Brahmin, Southern and Deep Southern. None were offensive. They were quaint. At times, incomprehensible, but quaint, not grating!
Today, however, I often feel like I’m in a foreign country.
Mind you, it’s not the actual foreigners and recent immigrants with whom I have
trouble communicating. It’s most often those born here whom I can’t understand!
Other pet peeves…
Starting a sentence with “So”. I don’t know whether it’s supposed to make the speaker sound smarter, whether it’s just another filler phrase, or whether it’s like a cat that hunches down, sticks its butt in the air and flicks its tale before pouncing, but this too is such an annoying corruption of our language!
“Right?” It’s incredibly annoying to hear people end their
sentences not just with an uptick but the word right, right?”
Oh, and there are the slightly more sophisticated but equally obnoxious phrases, “Let me be clear”, “To be completely honest”, or “At the end of the day.” You get the idea.
Perhaps it’s because my wife is English that I’m more bothered than most about the deterioration of our grammar and diction. You know the Brits… whether they’re from Chelsea and speak “frightfully” or are from London’s East End and speak like Eliza Doolittle before her transformation in My Fair Lady, or the chimney sweeps in Mary Poppins, they always sound so much more educated and serious than we. Let’s be fair, however. The way they speak and spell English can also be troublesome! But, as she constantly reminds me whenever we get into a spat about the proper way to phrase something, “Just remember, we gave you the language!” End of conversation.
Back in the stone age of 1972 William F. Buckley gave a
guest lecture at my college. The auditorium was filled with 60’s vintage,
recycled hippies and liberal academics. After laying out the ‘conservative
case’ he took questions. The showboating engaged in by the Leftists as they asked
pointed and mostly insulting questions was classic drivel. I’ll never forget,
however, the extraordinarily deft way that Buckley calmly used incisive,
fact-supported arguments, words and language to thoroughly gut each and every
one of his antagonists. His mastery of English was incomparable. He also had
that great side flick of the tongue to accompany his responses, and when the
moderator finally submitted to the shellacking being dealt out, ending the
session, the handful of us in the audience who weren’t 60’s radicals or poor
attempts at imitation thereof stood up and loudly and unapologetically
applauded!
While we’re trying to take back our country from Leftists, let’s try to restore American English to its proper, beautiful state…the English as written by our Founding Fathers. The English we heard spoken by the likes of Lincoln, Reagan, and William F. Buckley. And let’s try to restrain ourselves from wringing the necks of the valley-talk kids around us!
I pray it is not too late. I pray there are still places in our country where traditional values still prevail. But the other day I read an article in American Thinker: “When the Left Snatches our Kids” by Sally Zelikovsky, to whom all credit is due, that so closely reflects my fears that I’m going to “retweet it”, i.e. reproduce it in full. It is precisely the kind of alarm I’ve been trying to raise for my own children and grandchildren. It isn’t so much prescriptive as a call to arms. It succinctly rifles to the crux of all that’s going wrong with our society.
While I’ve been careful to distinguish between Conservative and Traditional in my writings, one could do a cut and paste, replacing the word Traditional with Conservative in the article and it would remain spot on. The italics are mine.
“I am skeptical that our efforts as conservative parents to produce conservative offspring will materialize. Even with the best of intentions, the odds are not in our favor to successfully counter the Democrat-Media Complex, the educational system, and pop culture. That doesn’t mean there aren’t success stories (some in my own family), but I hear more about the failure and the disaffection it engenders in conservative families.
Conservative parents have learned the hard way that how your kids turn out depends on a host of factors that, at some point during the maturation process, are way beyond our control — friends, personal experiences, a particular book or documentary, brain chemistry, friends, a teacher/professor/boss, personality, a romantic relationship, college activities, pop culture, hobbies, and…friends. Usually, it’s not one but an amalgamation of several factors and presto chango! The kid who was once the lone conservative arguing at the lunch table, now thinks David Hogg and AOC are bitchin’.
We see them everywhere — the emaciated college-age vegans working at Starbucks, hysterical young girls pounding on Supreme Court doors, attractive anti-Semites leading the charge in Congress. I’m sure some of them had conservative upbringings — you cannot assume they were all raised by liberals. Yet, in her reporting about out-of-control liberal college students some time ago, I heard Laura Ingraham link their behavior to their upbringing. Only a parent whose children hadn’t yet attended high school could make such an absurd connection. We can try but we cannot guarantee what our children will believe.
Once again, I find myself referencing Red Scare movies like Invasion of the Body Snatchers. It resonates. We have to be vigilant, stay informed, understand the arguments of the other side and how to combat them. If we don’t, eventually the pods take us over. I graduated high school a Reagan Republican whose political arguments were admittedly my Dad’s. When I arrived at a competitive college filled with smart, often private-school educated Merit scholars, I lost every political debate. I just didn’t have the breadth of information and understanding of history to counter their arguments. Thus, I graduated college…a Democrat. In time, I fell back on those critical thinking skills my parents instilled in me. A desire to understand more as I graduated from law school and entered the work force, led me to self-educate and, eventually, return to my conservative roots.
That was also in the ‘80s and early ‘90s when life was simpler and more balanced: when “gay marriage” was still an oxymoron; before triggers and safe spaces, the internet, social media, doom and gloom “climate change,” and legalized pot; before we had an alphabet of sexualities to choose from and the ability to change sexes; before blended families became the norm; before hatred became the quintessential reason for all of society’s ills.
Not all teachers and professors were proselytizing progressives, the media was less corrupt, and your politics were not a factor in getting or retaining a job. Because of the deep societal changes since then, not every Millennial or Gen Xer has the wherewithal, the background, or the backbone to recognize and then punch back against the forces of propaganda, fess up to and toil with their own ignorance, or simply engage in respectful debate with those who have another point of view — no matter how steeped in conservatism their childhood.
I am not suggesting we stop lecturing our children about competing points of view, stop teaching them to be skeptical about what they learn in school or from their peers, or stop challenging the false orthodoxies they are barraged with on virtually every topic from sexuality to climate, energy to food, and national security to border security. We should continue to bang the drum. We must. And we must remain hopeful that someday those we lost will return to the conservative fold because they see the wisdom of conservative principles. But for all of you young parents out there who think you’ll do better than those before you, be prepared for disappointment.
The conservative path is littered with the bodies of well-intentioned parents who are devastated when their formerly straight kids come out of imaginary closets, transition to the opposite sex, or demand to be called “they”; when their Jewish Day School educated children announce their support for the BDS movement; when their evangelical children support blatant infanticide; when their happy, well-adjusted kids go off to college and return believing weed is innocuous, struggling with drug addiction, or suffering from mental illness.
These cultural maladies affect liberals and conservatives alike, but are unusually bitter pills for conservatives to swallow because they are packaged in a lifestyle and value system antithetical to everything we teach our children — resilience, pride, integrity, honesty, open-mindedness, self-reliance, individuality, taking responsibility for our actions, doing right when we screw up, and teaching a man to fish. Liberals cast us as hypocrites whose principles clash with reality, but what they don’t understand is that we believe in taking responsibility for and learning from our missteps so we constantly evolve into better beings (and don’t get mired in unbridled, misplaced hatred and lifelong victimhood).
Secondly, conservative parents are treated by their children with a level of hostility that doesn’t seem to afflict liberal parents with conservative children. Loving, nurturing conservative parents find themselves catapulted to Holocaust-denier status and demoted to homophobic, intolerant, racist, privileged, religious zealots. Relics of an oppressive past. It is painful when your kids reject everything you raised them to value. Despise you. Scoff at you. Turn against you. Align with your political foes. Resent you for brainwashing them with yourhateful, 1950‘s agenda.
Now, some of that is typical teenage/young adult angst and rebellion. When frontal lobes are soothed by the right combination of hormones and our insecure little monsters segue into more confident adults, those nasty side effects often dissipate. But much of the antipathy they are exposed to is encouraged by “the man” in the liberal camp — we’ll call him “the burning man.” He instructs us to hate authority, hate anything established, hate tradition, hate the moral code you grew up with, hate anyone who is white or successful, and hate those who embrace any of this. Hence, hate your parents. Hate your old neighborhood. They are the problem. And while today all you have to do is oppose them, someday you might have to actively go against them, even “turn them in.” The burning man says this is okay because you are right and the end justifies the means. I’m not being paranoid. Our entire educational system is based on appropriating the minds of our children and undoing all they have learned at home, turning them into weapons of mass societal destruction in the burning man’s toolbox.
We have all participated in holiday dinners and family vacations ruined by dissension and door-slamming. Family harmony devolves into family discord, function into dysfunction, and closeness morphs into estrangement. Parents are instructed to just shut up already! Politics and religion are off the table. Dinner conversations revolve around silly cat videos and trivial drivel. Soon there is little left to discuss. After all, everything is political now — from your sneakers to your bus commute during Pride Month.
Once upon a time, we could fall back on cultural interests like music, movies, theater, travel, and sports to avoid potentially explosive conversations at family gatherings about politics and religion. Now, virtue signaling is so ubiquitous that everything seems to fall into the Realm of the verboten. It becomes more and more difficult to find common ground. Constructive input I like your haircut and simple questions Did you decide on a major? What are you doing for break? How do you like your job? are potential triggers. Family get togethers are so contentious there is an increasing tendency to minimize interactions. Even life’s big “hatching, matching, and dispatching” events are often fraught with tension — relatives who couldn’t be seated together because of some family squabble are now separated because one has a worldview the other finds detestable.
Some parents give in. They don’t want politics or values to stand in the way of their relationships with their kids, so they re-visit their Weltanschauung. Constant pressure from your 20-year-old bubelah goes a long way towards re-educating Mom and Dad. Senator Rob Portman was against gay marriage until his son came out and then… he evolved. I’d rather fight than switch is a paean to another time.
This is nothing new. Many parents drank the Kool-Aid and became part of the 60s counterculture their children brought home. Ironically, many of their hippie children became yuppies and did the unthinkable — morphed into their conservative parents. Hmm. I suppose we can be clear-eyed about the transformative societal and political forces pulling our children away from conservatism, at the same time we cling to the hope that our liberal progeny will switch and fight for conservative principles and maybe even cling to their bibles and the Constitution, too.”
Wish I could have said it like that!
Comment by DOC DURACOAT August 3, 2019: “All you people should move to Boca Raton, Florida! Our public high school has been rated A for the last 10 years straight. We have a very active ROTC program, and it is routine to see these kids in the halls wearing military uniforms. The flag is respected, everyone stands for the pledge of allegiance, even the minority students. Graduation rates and college acceptance rates are very high. Discipline is enforced, disrupting class is not tolerated. My kids and their friends all graduated as sports playing, modest dressing, great conservative kids. Come on down and bring your guns and bibles! Your kids will graduate with a great education and strong conservative moral values.”
It’s not that the study of human behavior and interaction in the fields of Anthropology, Archaeology, Economics, Geography, History, Law, Linguistics, Politics, Psychology and Sociology, the so-called Social Sciences, isn’t useful. It’s just that they’re not SCIENCE, and one of our big problems today is that their practitioners use a lot of questionable or rigged scientific data and analysis to advance special interests and hidden agendas.
Science, as it was rationally taught when I was in 6th grade, was based on the use of the Scientific Method, the principles of which have been around since Sir Isaac Newton wrote Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica in 1687. “Social Science”, misleadingly named to give it an air of formality, rigor and credibility that Newton would never have ascribed to it, and to which the Scientific Method can’t be applied, belongs to what serious scientists label as Junk or Pseudo Science.
Today, the Left-infested science curriculum has turned the
Scientific Method into mush. Here’s the definition from the website Science
Buddies which illustrates what I mean:
“The scientific method is a process for experimentation
that is used to explore observations and answer questions. Does this mean all
scientists follow exactly this process? No. Some areas of
science can be more easily tested than others. For example, scientists studying
how stars change as they age or how dinosaurs digested their food cannot
fast-forward a star’s life by a million years or run medical exams on feeding
dinosaurs to test their hypotheses. When direct experimentation is not
possible, scientists modify the scientific method. In fact, there are probably
as many versions of the scientific method as there are scientists! But even
when modified, the goal remains the same: to discover cause and effect
relationships by asking questions, carefully gathering and examining the
evidence, and seeing if all the available information can be combined into a logical
answer.”
This kind of relativist nonsense is but one example of how our kids and grandkids are being brainwashed into believing that there is no right or wrong, no good and evil, everyone deserves a trophy and other Leftist necroses of traditional common sense.
One of the keystones of the Scientific Method is repeatable process. A hypothesis, then a theory, doesn’t become a fact until controlled experimentation occurs in a methodical, empirical manner. But importantly, it has to be reproducible by others using identically controlled methods.
In March 1989 two respected University of Utah professors
published a paper insisting they produced so-called “cold fusion” in
their laboratory: the production of energy without the usual exothermic
reaction that occurs in nuclear fusion or atomic bombs. Their scholarly work was widely circulated
and got the whole scientific and business world in a tizzy. What doomed them
was that no-one could reproduce what they say they observed notwithstanding the
precise replication of their methods!
One of the other cornerstones of the Scientific Method is that a theory has to be able to be validated. Another way of saying this is that theory only becomes fact once it can no longer be refuted by experimentation and observation. The social sciences rely on the review of gathered data, rather than the scientific method of hypothesis – theory – experimentation – validation – reproduction – peer review to assert facts that simply aren’t! And what social scientists do is put forth an idea based on some interpretation of the data, whether accurate, selective, falsified or otherwise, and then say, “Prove me wrong” to the rest of world. Their theories almost by definition can NOT be validated and thus can’t seriously be considered science. Oh, and “send me more money so I can continue to do research.” That is the very essence of Junk or Pseudo Science.
So, when Leftists of all stripes spout their dogma and profess it to have scientific backing, I urge you to throw what we call the BS flag! Don’t let the attachment of the word “science” to anything said by a politician, an economist, a lawyer, a psychologist, a sociologist or any kind of bureaucrat, (Right or Left by the way), cloud your judgment. That’s unless it’s REAL SCIENCE as we learned it in the sixth grade , not FAKE science!
I’m not a fan (understatement) of pop-psych, but of all the
tests and profiles that various employers put me through during my career, one
stands out as actually practical and useful: The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator®.
I have consistently found it to be uncannily accurate in explaining and
predicting human behavior, particularly interpersonal behavior. In our
families, the MBTI® can promote understanding, enhance communication, and fuel
patience and forgiveness that we might not otherwise be able to muster.
Based on the work of the Swiss psychiatrist Carl Jung, the
MBTI was created by Katharine Cook Briggs (1875-1968) and her daughter Isabel
Briggs Myers (1897-1979). In this article I’ll barely scratch the surface of
the behavioral model, so apologies to the psychologists and psychiatrists among
my readers who would justifiably quibble with my treatment and usage. But here
goes.
The MBTI groups people into personality “types”
based on four behaviors or dimensions:
a. How we get our energy b. How we gather information c. How we make decisions d. How we order our lives
Within each of these four behavioral dimensions there is a range
or continuum which describes our “preference”.
The first behavioral dimension is: How we get our
energy. The continuum ranges from what Jung called Extraversion at
one end of the spectrum to Introversion at the other, the so-called ‘E-I
Preference‘. Note that the first is spelled Extraversion, not
extroversion. It’s not about how we behave outwardly, i.e. whether we’re
socially extroverted or introverted. It’s more about how we respond to others
and whether interpersonal engagement energizes or depletes us.
At a party, for example, the individuals with the E
preference gain energy by being around others. As the night wears on,
they seem to get perkier and perkier (with or without alcohol) while those who
are natural I’s become more and more exhausted.
It’s probably a good idea to emphasize here that no-one is
either always Extraverted, nor Introverted and this is true vis-à-vis the other
three dimensions as well. Whether a person is a so-called “E” or a
so-called “I” is relative. E or I is a preference and we can
be both. It’s just that we’re born, as the theory goes, with a natural tendency
or “preference” one way or the other. Fold your arms. You have a
natural preference for which arm goes over the top. Now fold them the other way.
You can DO it, but you clearly prefer and have a preference to do it the
other way right? That’s what we mean when speaking of preference in behavior.
The second behavioral dimension describes How we soak
up information. The preference continuum here extends from Sensor
to Intuitive. I like to explain this dimension by telling the story of
the two people sitting side by side in a plane approaching their destination
airport. The plane is in thick clouds and the plane is bump, jumping up and
down in the turbulence. The two people have their eyes glued on the window, but
all they can see is grey. Suddenly, they burst out of the clouds and the
airport is plainly visible below. The Intuitive says, “Ah, we’re
there.” The Sensor replies, “Not until we’re on the ground we’re
not!”
For the Sensor sees precisely ‘what is’ while the intuitive
sees ‘what could be’. Where we fit on this preference continuum has a major
impact on how we take in information. The ‘S’ and the ‘N’ individuals as
they’re called, can be presented with the exact same set of facts or sensory
input and interpret them 180 degrees apart! Not surprisingly, 70% of men are
S’s while 70% of women are N’s. (Hence the term ‘women’s intuition’!)
The third behavioral dimension is How we make
decisions. The preference continuum here is Thinking at one end
and Feeling at the other. In recent years we’re heard a lot about
“Emotional Intelligence”. In a way I believe that concept gives
support to the argument that decisions don’t have to be made in our left brains
all the time. They can also be made in the gut, and they’re just as valid. But
‘T’s are all about laying out the evidence, analyzing it, coming to an incisive
and informed decision. ‘F’s are about unconsciously mulling things over
viscerally and making their decisions based on how they ‘feel’ about them. Needless
to say, most scientists are T’s, and the majority of men are T’s, while the
majority of women are F’s.
The final behavioral dimension is How we order our
lives. The preferences range from Judgers on one end and Perceivers
at the other. Judgers are ordered. They make lists. If they accomplish a task
that they didn’t put on the list, they’ll write it on the list after the fact
and cross it out! Perceivers prefer to ‘go with the flow’, and are spontaneous
and accepting of whatever comes at them. This preference, in my opinion, causes
people who are strongly opposite to make each other crazy!
With four behavioral dimensions and two end points on the
preference continuum each there are 16 possible combinations of Dimensions and
Preferences and we tend to, upon testing with the MBTI, fall into one of the
16. So, in one corner of the matrix for example we have an ESTJ person: the
Extraverted Sensor Thinker Judger. At an opposite corner we might have the
INFP, the Introverted Intuitive Feeler Perceiver.
Going back to the party. The ESTJ or ENTJ commands
attention, some would say ‘holding court’. He or she has an opinion on
everything and anything and will tell you about it. When offered a tray of
cocktails they might first select the martini, then in a split second put it
down and instead take a gin and tonic. They will of course take a cocktail
napkin and hold it under the drink as they bring it to their lips. The INFP,
meanwhile, is politely smiling as someone bends their ear. They nod, they
listen actively and intently. When the cocktail tray comes by they ask the
waiter to describe the contents of each drink. They put their fist to their
chin and take quite a few seconds to mull over what they want. Once they make
up their mind, however, they take the drink and will not change it two
seconds later like the ESTJ did.
By the way, the ESTJ is attracted (opposites attract right?)
to the INFP because they display the qualities the ESTJ does not. The opposite
is of course true of the INFP, who admires and values the ‘strength of
character’ of the ESTJ.
For fun, I’ll stipulate that the ESTJ is a guy and the INFP
is a gal. They get married because they are, in fact, opposites attracted to
one another. However, fast forward a few years and it’s inevitable, in my
experience, that that opposite-ness causes tremendous conflict. That’s not to
suggest that they shouldn’t have gotten married. It’s almost inevitable,
however, that they really have to work at their relationship.
Meanwhile, two ESTJ’s get married. They constantly bang
heads and argue and fight, but they go to separate corners and unwaveringly
come back at it until they come to some sort of truce, compromise or shared
understanding. Two INFP’s get married and they’ll sit silently in a room
together and simply enjoy and be completely satisfied in one another’s company.
Eventually, they’ll fall off a cliff holding hands but won’t argue while doing
so. And they’ll end up on their feet anyway!
One of the things I like about the MBTI is that it doesn’t
make judgments good or bad, positive or negative about these preferences. In
fact, the seminal work on the model is called “Gifts Differing”, suggesting
that each of the 16 personality types has gifts or talents, and there is no
right or wrong among them. They’re just, well, different.
Here’s an example of how an understanding of “Type”
can be useful. The ESTJ and the INFP are sipping the last of their wine at the
end of dinner on a Sunday evening in August. The ESTJ husband says, “Hey
Hon, how about we go skiing as a family next February.” The INFP wife,
after a pause, says, “That’s not a bad idea.” The husband takes that
answer as a thumbs up and a month later he’s got a whole family ski trip
planned out. Along the way, he’s checked in with his wife, “What do you
think of this condo, or that kids instruction package?” He repeatedly gets
an answer similar to the first, “That’s not a bad idea.”
The family takes the vacation, has a great time and ten
years later in family counseling the wife brings up this episode, emphatic that
she never wanted to go on that trip! Struggling to remember the details, the
husband says, “Hey, I checked with you at the outset and every step of the
way in planning that trip! Why didn’t you speak up?” The wife replies,
“Because you never gave me any time to think about it!”
Had the ESTJ husband understood Type, he would have realized
that asking what seemed like a straightforward question of his INFP wife was
not straightforward at all to her. Rather, the INFP needed to process the question:
take in the idea and internally explore it (the “N” in her), then mull
it over at the gut level (the “F” in her), and finally take time to consider
the whole concept and come to a complete and clear decision (the “P”
in her). By the time she’d done that, the ESTJ husband was miles down the planning
road!
The patience required of polar opposite husband and wife to
reach a mutually satisfying compromise decision is huge, emotionally draining
and if that kind of difference in approaching life is tested many times a day, one
will understand why opposites attract but inevitably have to work so hard to
have a good relationship!
I could go on and on sharing anecdote after anecdote of how
the very opposite personality types deal with one another within families, in
the workplace, among friends, among strangers, in public, in private…how an
understanding of the personality type of someone with whom we’re dealing could
help us achieve whatever goal we have with that interaction, or how it is that
when one is under stress one tends to behave as if they are the exact opposite
of who they are when not under stress.
Instead, I urge you to read Gifts Differing, and if you’re still working or thinking about your career, the book named “Do What You Are“. I’ve also provided below a cheat sheet (credit to Jake Beech) that pithily summarizes the 16 MBTI types.
The Left assiduously and furiously manufactures, celebrates and loudly publicizes victimhood. This gives them a pretense to extort money they can use as currency to gather power, influence and advance their agenda. Meanwhile, the majority of Americans keep their heads down and continue to do their jobs and their best for their families, their friends, their community, their country, and themselves.
In her exhaustively and incisively researched seminal work, “The Forgotten Man” (Harper Collins, New York, 2007) Amity Shlaes argues conclusively that the Great Depression was man-made and completely avoidable. She borrowed the term “Forgotten Man” from William Graham Sumner’s use of the term in his 1883 speech of the same name. The Left has always equated the Forgotten Man with those who stood in the bread lines during the Depression. However, Sumner and Shlaes used the term to denote the regular guy who had to pay for all the promises that politicians, both before, during and after Roosevelt made to garner power and control.
I submit that today, the Silent Majority is the Forgotten
Man, comprised of similar salt-of-the-earth people who have had to pay for all
the promises made by Roosevelt’s intellectual progeny, including today’s
Leftists.
It used to be just the snail darter. Remember them? It’s
tiny a fish that bleeding-heart enviro-fascists manufactured victimhood for in
1973 to halt completion of a dam in California. The controversy went all the
way to the Supreme Court. Long story short, the dam was built, the snail
darters relocated all at a cost no doubt of hundreds of thousands of dollars,
if not millions to taxpayers. It, however, lined the pockets of the Defenders
of the Snail Darters Brigade (I made that up but I can’t help but wonder if
money could have been made on a tee-shirt run with that emblazoned on it!) and
Leftists were left (.sic) to feel good about how they’d saved a species. As a
side note, the environmental shamans themselves assert that 150 species A DAY
(!) become extinct. But the snail darter became the cause célèbre du jour and
the money, when followed, led right into the wallets of the enviro-fascists, their
cohorts and allies.
Today, pick whatever Leftist drivel you wish, on whatever
topic you wish: border protection, religion, free speech, 2nd amendment,
abortion, gender confusion, climate change, taxation, law and order, national
defense, public education, etc. etc. The economic price, the damage to our
society and culture, the frightening impact on our children and grandchildren of
what the Left has concocted and viciously squeal…the burden will be carried
by the hardworking Forgotten Majority who always pay the price, just as they
did during the Depression.
When the Left professes to worry about some minority victim being offended, or potentially offended (think Colin Kaepernick and Betsy Ross Nike sneakers) and seek to punish the offenders; when they rewrite history and seek to “fundamentally transform” our nation according to their warped ideology (think the painting over of the George Washington school mural in San Francisco), let’s not forget the majority, The FORGOTTEN Majority.
Attributed to the American author Samuel R. Delany is the phrase “Words mean things.” Hijacking words and phrases is a powerful tool in the arsenal of the demagogue. And the twisting of usage and meaning into pretzels has always been a favorite device of politicians and pundits. With this in mind, I thought I should explain what I mean when I refer in my writing to Traditional Values, Traditionalists and Traditionalism.
Look up Traditionalism and you’ll receive a panoply of descriptions and definitions. One of the first articles that comes up from a search is: “a school of thought promulgated by a group of 20th and 21st century thinkers who believe in the existence of perennial wisdom, or perennial philosophy, primordial and universal truths which form the source for, and are shared by, all the major world religions.” Look further and one goes through the looking glass and into a rabbit warren of definitions in the context of societal norms, religion, philosophy, economics, culture, etc.
In 1964 Supreme Court Justice Potter Steward famously described obscenity (or rather, what it is not) as follows:
“I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description [“hard-core pornography”], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.”
Jacobellis v. Ohio 378 U.S. 184 (1964)
Borrowing on that phrase, I will suggest that Traditionalism may be defined in a variety of ways, but in the end, Traditionalists know it when they see it.
However, a shortcut to how I define Traditionalism is: that body of ideals, values and mores that we were raised on by the Greatest Generation.
Speaking of the Greatest Generation, one of the definitions of Traditionalists refers to those who were born between 1900 and 1945. I believe it is precisely because of their espousal of Traditional Values that they were Great!
We Baby Boomers born between 1946 and 1964 on the other hand, are split into two camps: a) those of us who listened to what our Greatest Generation parents taught us, who were grateful for the peace and prosperity they bequeathed to us and who have tried to live our lives by their example and rules; and, b) the prodigals, the “Me” generation of the sexual revolution who grew up to be the radicals of the 70’s and the yuppies of the 80’s, a few of whom have come home to Traditionalism and the balance of whom have become today’s Leftists.
So what do I mean by Traditional Values? Often the term is conflated with “Family Values.” They are similar, but Traditionalism goes beyond Family Values. To me, Traditional Values include support for:
individual freedom to live as we wish within the basic constraints of Judeo-Christian principles;
the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights as they were intended for then and all future generations;
fundamental patriotism, including honoring our Flag, national symbols, anthems and emblems;
a strong military and national defense and protection of our sovereignty;
the right of self-defense and to keep, bear and utilize arms to ensure that right;
obeying the Law and supporting those who serve in law enforcement;
marriage defined as between one man and one woman (including acceptance of the biological fact that men and women are different!);
support for nuclear families consisting of a father and mother and their children;
freedom of worship and expression;
the Golden Rule;
support for and defense of free-market capitalism;
equal opportunity, not equal outcomes; and,
separation of powers within a limited, and republican government.
Traditional Values also include opposition to:
social engineering and bad (many wouldsay EVIL) social, economic and political ideologies such as socialism and communism;
crony capitalism;
‘free love’ and promiscuity;
abortion on demand and in lieu of contraception;
gender confusion;
LGBTQ militancy;
fascism masquerading as liberal or progressive free expression;
violent protest; and,
collectivism, globalism, cultural marxism and so-called “progressivism”.
The Greatest Generation didn’t have to think about or debate these principles – they lived them. They were part of the fabric of their society.
Today, these principles are under constant assault.
I used to teach a lesson in Sunday School using a glass of water and a dropper full of black ink. The water represented our souls. In the context of this article, it represents the reservoir of societal values. The black drops of ink I slowly added to the water represent, for purposes of this article, Progressive/Leftist ideas, norms, habits, values. Add one drop to the water and nothing seems to happen. As successively more drops are added, however, the water starts to turn grey, then greyer, murky, and finally black.
The metaphor aptly describes what’s happening to our country.
I hope and pray I’m joined by the
Silent Majority of our Boomer generation and budding Traditionalists of succeeding
generations in fighting for a return to the Traditional principles that made us
the greatest nation on earth and in the history of the world.
TODAY IS
Friday March 06, 2026
The NEW Western Hemisphere
Screenshot
Quips & Quotes
January 27, 2026 "I believe the American people need to wake up. This moment is a warning about where we’re headed. Fear pushes people to care only about their money and their families—I get it. But when fear turns inward, when self-preservation and greed replace moral courage, evil goes unchallenged. And history shows that what we ignore today will come for all of us tomorrow." James O' Keefe on X
January 9, 2026 "Leftists function on the assumption that they can skirt the law while using it as a shield against reprisal. They do it over and over and usually they get away with it. They whittle us down by stabbing at us from behind a curtain of gray legality. I’m tired of it, and I think many millions of other Americans are also tired of it. We’re done playing nice." Brandon Smith, Discern Report, 1/9/26, "How Dare You Fight Back Against Communists"
December 20, 2025 "Subscriber counts are the native language of audience capture—proof that attention has replaced persuasion as the coin of influence." Colby Hall, "Ben Shapiro Is Losing a MAGA Audience That’s No Longer Interested In the Truth", Mediaite, 12/20/25
November 20, 2025 "The president’s goal really is to return education to the states, he believes, as I do, the best education is that closest to the child, that is being supervised by their parents, by teachers, by school superintendents, by the governors in those states." Linda McMahon, interview with Alex Marlow on Breitbart News11/20/25
August, 2025 "Never give up. Never surrender, and always go for the win." Charlie Kirk
April 20, 2025 "There’s a price to pay when you go all-in on DEI—and the piper always comes calling. You can’t lower standards, abandon merit, and inject politics into everything, then act shocked when the results go straight into the toilet. Life doesn’t work that way. Businesses don’t work that way. And elite universities certainly don’t work that way.
Once the gold standard of higher education, they’ve become a punchline—rotting from the inside out thanks to progressive nonsense and DEI disasters. It’s gotten so bad, they’re now offering high school-level math to students who can’t keep up—students who have no business being at Harvard in the first place. These aren’t academic standouts—they’re DEI charity cases, picked because of the color of their skin or their sexual fetishes.
Let’s be honest—you don’t need a Harvard Ph.D. to see what’s going on here. When you stop choosing the best and start choosing the most diverse, you don’t get excellence. You get mediocrity, decline, and total embarrassment.
That’s exactly what former law professor Jonathan Turley is sounding the alarm about.
Turley took to X and pointed out that since 1636, Harvard has prided itself on admitting only the best students with the highest scores. And shockingly now, it only took one generation of woke ninnies to wipe all of that greatness out." Revolver, April 19, 2025 "The Mayo Clinic just tried to pull a fast one on the Trump administration, but social media busted them…"
April 4, 2025 "American families have been strip-mined, plundered, and debrided of healthy tissue, that essential primordial ooze from which happy parents and children spring. Americans have been forced to soak in sterilizing solvent—liberal feminism, K–12 school indoctrination, toxic social media, and four years at woke finishing schools formerly known as “college.” How could anyone escape with their morals, identity, and mind intact? Many don’t.Some manage to make it through the gauntlet intact, but their children aren’t so lucky; their budding hopes and dreams are blown apart or mangled by landmines buried in the ground. These landmines include infinitehorizon dating, the abortion industry complex, the failure to marry or stay married, unwanted childlessness, careerism, opioid addiction, pornography, “finding yourself,” and the temptation to sell your eggs, your sexuality, your identity, and your soul to the highest bidder—among many others. All that’s left is a cohort of young people unable to form meaningful relationships, raise children, and otherwise perpetuate the species into the future. Loneliness, depression, drug abuse, infertility, and generalized despair have taken hold." Peachy Keenan, (2003) "Domestic Extremist", Regenery Publishing, New York
January 2, 2024 "As we enter 2024, there is widespread public agreement about two things: (1) something big is about to happen, and (2) whatever that something is, it sure as hell won’t be pretty! While it may get pretty ugly pretty fast, though, there is an upside to what’s coming: as a country, we can finally pull this disgusting Band-Aid off, face reality for what it is, and stop pretending. However bad this year might prove to be, it might also be tremendously liberating.
Why? Because, one way or another, things will soon change. For too long, those who “run” America have had two things in common: (1) a hatred for individual freedoms, and (2) an even deeper hatred for the one country on the planet explicitly founded on their protection. As a national security surveillance State superseded the U.S. Constitution, leftists have controlled academia, journalism, the legal system, and entertainment. They have shoved anyone with a working brain out the door while assuring themselves that they deserve their privileged social positions and unearned accolades. They tell themselves that they are smart and enlightened, but anybody capable of self-examination knows this not to be true. Leftists are not happy people. They have not figured out any special meaning to life because, to them, life is meaningless. In other words, for too many years, a collection of the most depressed, least curious, morally relativistic, and intellectually homogenous people on the planet have been given pampered positions in exchange for acting as nihilistic and narcotic-dependent sea vessel captains willing to steer America into an iceberg of decline and failure." J.B. Shurk, American Thinker, January 2, 2024 "Do We Hit the Iceberg or Finally Change Course?"
November 3, 2023 "There’s a subtext to nearly all American political trends today. It’s hardly ever spoken about overtly and explicitly. But the topic is nonetheless always there. All insiders know about it. It’s also the central and critical debate concerning America’s future.
The question is as follows. Will the United States continue the present system whereby representative democracy persists as a mere veneer to keep the public distracted and defocused on the real rulers in the nation? Or will something dramatic be achieved whereby the swamp is truly drained, the administrative state gutted, the agencies disempowered, and we return to an actual constitutional system in which the people truly rule themselves through their elected representatives?
These are the two paths. It’s one or the other. They’re mutually incompatible." Jeffrey A. Tucker, November 3, 2023, Epoch Times, p A22, "Are You an Institutionalist or Anti-Institutionalist?"
October 30, 2023 "If you want an indicator of how lost Western civilization has become, go to your kids’ school and check their rules on fighting. Most likely, you’ll find out if two kids get into a fight, both get suspended, regardless of whether one was a punk bully who started it and the other was simply defending himself or some little kid. This is a moral disaster, of course – violence in the defense of what is right is a moral obligation and a symbol of a greater rot within society."
"The world's true nature is that good is forever pitted against evil."
"We must learn again to be ruthless in defeating our enemies. The big lie that Western civilization tells itself is that there are no real enemies, that there are no bad people – except the people of the West themselves, who bear some sort of original sin for not being corrupt and inept Third World barbarians."
"We have forgotten our strength and our courage. We have forgotten that we survive not through gentle hugging but through sword-swinging.The idea that Israel should somehow give these Hamas barbarians food, water, and electrical power even if it surrounds Gaza and prepares to attack is mind-boggling insanity. The moral illiteracy of expecting Israel to care more about the Palestinian people than other Palestinians do is simply bizarre."
"The hard truth is that the world contains bad people who must be crushed through ruthless violence, which shocks and horrifies modern sensibilities. But it is reality nonetheless. When people want to kill you, you are at a decision point. You can either let them kill you or stop them. But stopping them often involves aesthetically displeasing actions, such as blowing them into little bits with bombs or shoving a bayonet into their guts and watching them die in agony. And it necessarily means inflicting death and damage on the noncombatant camp followers around them. That’s why they say war is hell. And that’s why starting one is probably not a good idea. But when someone else starts one, you have to choose them or you. Someone’s going to die badly, and you know, I propose it is those other guys."
October 16, 2023 "Though around the world sociopaths stabbed some folks, the Day of Jihad fizzled in America – how many bummed patriots slammed in a mag hoping some mutant was going to choose his small town to prove Jason Aldean right? But it is only a matter of time. When you allow millions of military-aged males to come unvetted into your country, including many from bizarre hellholes where hatred for Americana is more common than food and indoor plumbing, there is a non-zero chance that some of them are part of sleeper cells waiting for the signal to murder Americans here at home." Kurt Schlichter, Town Hall, October 16, 2023, "We Are Sitting Ducks And Our Leaders Do Not Care"
August 22, 2023 "When arguing in federal court in HI in 2020, I had to get permission from the governor to enter his precious state to argue that his silly COVID lockdowns violated the Constitution. I lost. This same state, in real life, has shown how little respect for life its leaders really have. My perfectly healthy clients were not allowed to travel from one island to another to visit their own property. American citizens were turned away at the airport because they got the wrong COVID test on the mainland. The hotel gave me “parole” from the one way card key rule only to do my legal business and leave. I could not call an Uber or take a taxi at the airport. The National Guard met me at the gate to escort me to Hawaii COVID immigration to provide my information, which they verified with the hotel. I was to keep my phone on at all times so that they could track my location. This same police state didn’t turn the water on in Lahaina, didn’t have sirens, can’t begin to tell you how many children died from their incompetence. Or begin to explain it. Remember all this the next time you are asked to comply with farcical, unjust “laws” made by dictators. They are lying when their lips are moving about how much they care about you and your little life and your paper constitutional rights. Americans are beginning to realize how much we are on our own. Such a betrayal." Harmeet K. Dhillon, on "X", 8/22/23 12:44 AM
August 17, 2023 - A MUST READ!!!! The following is a transcription of Newt Gingrich's comments on Hannity last night. "“I think what you’re seeing tonight is one tree in a forest, and I think we are drifting towards the greatest Constitutional crisis since the 1850s, uh, and the rise of secession and the Civil War. I don’t mean that as hyperbole. Uh, if you read Andy McCarthy’s remarkable book, Ball of Collusion, which came out in 2019, he makes very clear that it is Barack Obama who corrupts the Justice Department, it is Hillary Clinton who routinely breaks the law and gets away with it. And now we have Joe Biden who’s learned, he’s learned from Obama that is doesn’t matter what you do, if you’re a liberal Democrat, you will not be prosecuted. He learned from Hillary that a person in high public office can get millions and millions of dollars. And they learned from watching Donald Trump that a true outsider, willing to take on the entire system, could destroy their entire machine. So what you’re seeing across the country, is a desperate, last-ditch effort by a corrupt machine to destroy their most dangerous opponent in a way which not only breaks the Constitution, destroys the rule of law, and establishes a moment of bitterness, uh, which I think will last for a generation or more. I think this is gonna be a horrendous period and we just need to understand: The people who want to control America and dictate to the rest of us will break any law, lie about any topic, and manipulate the system any way they can, and that includes a lot of the elite news media.”
August 10, 2023 "The fact that young men are getting more conservative is a cause for optimism. Remember, if you grew up male in the last ten years or so, every institution has been deployed against you. You’ve been told you are bad and horrible and evil and worthless. In contrast, every girl is an empowered girlboss ready to take her rightful place at the pinnacle of society. And to facilitate that, they must displace the dudes. And it’s no secret – that displacement, that consignment of men to second-class status, is not merely admitted but celebrated by our trash ruling class." Kurt Schlichter, August 10, 2023, Town Hall, "Angry Young Men Are Going To Disrupt The Garbage Paradigm"
Articles/Writings We Think Are A Must Read
Who Will Say No More to the Current Madness?
Once again, Victor Davis Hanson has nailed it. In his article there is a list of the most egregious crimes and failings of the Left and this Administration. Stronly urge readers to read the whole article. Here’s an excerpt of the most salient points:
“America is in existential danger.
The Biden administration has utterly destroyed the southern border — and immigration law with it.
Biden green lighted 7 million illegal aliens swarming into the U.S. without legal sanction or rudimentary audit.
China spies inside and over the U.S. with impunity. Beijing has never admitted to its responsibility for the gain-of-function COVID virus that killed a million Americans.
President Joe Biden printed $4 trillion at exactly the wrong time of soaring post-COVID consumer demand and supply shortages. No wonder he birthed the worst inflation in 40 years.
In response, interest rates tripled, gas prices doubled.
Our military is thousands of recruits short. It lacks sufficient munitions.
Following Biden’s humiliating pullout from Afghanistan, vast troves of arms were abandoned in Kabul. Billions more in scarce weapons were sent to Ukraine.
The Pentagon’s woke agenda trumps meritocracy in promotions and advancement.
Our enemies — Russia, China, Iran, North Korea — are on the move, while the U.S. seems listless.
The Biden renegade Department of Justice, CIA and FBI have become weaponized. Ideology, politics, and race — not the law — more often guide their investigations, intelligence operations and enforcement.
The downtowns of our once majestic major cities are becoming unlivable.
They are mired in refuse and trash, violent crime and homelessness. Stores and businesses leave. Millions each year flee the blue urban coasts to the red west and south.
To even say there are still two biological genders, that global warming may not be entirely manmade or necessarily destroying the planet, or that class, not race, is the proper barometer of inequality is to face ostracism and career cancellation.
The public assumes that Biden is severely cognitively challenged, likely corrupt, and a serial fabricator.
Most know what must be done, but few will tell the truth: Balance the budget. Return to legal only immigration. Restore a well-funded, but unwoke Pentagon.
Insist on racial unity. Curb the overweening administrative state. Enforce the rule of law.
Produce more gas and oil. Reestablish civic education. Insist universities protect free speech and due process — and stop proselytizing.
In other words, restore what until recently made America the strongest, most prosperous, and freest nation in the world. And quit undoing all the great good that eight generations of prior Americans bequeathed to us.”
Victor Davis Hanson saying it better than anyone. Perfectly describes the childish, impetuous behavior of the Left. A quick and incredibly accurate take on everything we see before our eyes.
An excerpt:
“Cry-baby tantrums won’t win over the public. These nonstop puerile meltdowns have turned off most Americans who tire of whiny narcissistic hypocrites.”
Strongly recommend the artful summary of what the Left is trying to do with the Disinformation Governance Board canard written by Michael Walsh in “The Pipeline”, May 2, 2022. You’ll find the whole article here. Some excerpts:
“So now the mask has dropped and, for the first time, the American people can see the modern Left in all its hateful, unadorned, vituperative, spiteful glory. Case in point: the announcement last week that the Department of Homeland Security—one of the excrescences of the Bush administration, cobbled together in its panic over 9/11—has created the “Disinformation Governance Board” in order to combat what it has, via its hitherto little-known Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, already dubbed “mis-, dis-, and mal-information.” Otherwise known as alternative points of view, but shut up, citizen.”
“Let us now remind ourselves of the late historian and Soviet scholar Robert Conquest’s third law of politics: “The simplest way to explain the behavior of any bureaucratic organization is to assume that it is controlled by a cabal of its enemies.” At this point in American history, that is not only a theory but a fact. Having narrowly “won” the 2020 election by stealing it fair and square, the Left is putting pedal to the metal to accomplish as much of its anti-foundational agenda as it can before the clock runs out on its tiny congressional majorities this fall.”
On the Subject of “Things happening in the background to purge the illicit Biden administration“
The article in American Thinker by Dr. Brian Joondeph entitled: “Nothing Can Stop What is Coming. What if Nothing is Coming?” lays out the case for the increasingly skeptical that anything is going to halt the Leftist Leviathan. Strongly recommend this article not to throw cold water on all the hope so many of us have of there being some justice on the horizon, but to lay out the stark possibility that it’s all wishful thinking and we’re stuck with what we’ve got at least until January 2023.
On Climate Change Fraud
One of the best debunking articles/videos I’ve seen recently on the revolting fraud being perpetrated by the climate alarmists. In very calm, easy to understand terms the author shows how graphs and picking the right starting point for data visualization is being used to create the narrative that they rely on for their funding, their power, their nefarious attempts to alter society and our world. This same manipulation occurs with ALL kinds of data and the Left is expert in obscuring truth, altering perception and brainwashing a lazy, non-thinking mass of sheep to believe what they want them to believe. Strongly recommend watching this…12 minutes long and a must see!
Featured Friends
Straight Line Logic
Robert Gore’s blog. I put Gore up there with Victor Davis Hanson, Jordan Peterson and Thomas Sowell. His theses are chock full of substance.
The Burning Platform
Unabashedly conspiracy-theory driven, but thoughtfully so and well-written. Makes one think, “could this really be what’s happening?”
